United States of America v. Rohan et al
United States of America |
Vicki Lott Rohan |
Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama |
2:2020mc03919 |
July 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
R Austin Huffaker |
Emily C Marks |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr. as Presiding Judge; Chief Judge Emily C. Marks no longer assigned to the case. (amf, ) |
Filing 5 US Marshal ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to Vicki Lott Rohan re #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment, Notice, #2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement and #3 Writ of Garnishment, served 8/20/2020. (dmn, ) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment & #3 Writ of Garnishment, signed by Cheryl Sayles, Assistant Director, for Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama, served on 8/13/2020.(amf, ) |
Filing 3 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued & furnished to USMS for service. (amf, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by United States of America. (amf, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Instructions to Garnishee, #2 Notice of Garnishment and Instructions to Debtor, #3 Claim for Exemption Form, #4 Proposed Writ, #5 Answer of Garnishee Form)(amf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.