In Re: United States Marshals Service Personal Firearm Protocol
In Re: United States Marshals Service Personal Firearm Protocol
Case Number: 2:2020mc03926
Filed: September 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Emily C Marks
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 GENERAL ORDER: With the consent and approval of the Marshal for the Middle District of Alabama, it is ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service contracted Court Security Officers ("CSO"s) and CSO management are authorized to carry a personally owned handgun (firearm) into any federal courthouse building in the Middle District of Alabama for the purpose of storing said firearm(s) in a secure place while on official duty as a CSO, subject, however, to the following conditions, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/29/2020. (kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: United States Marshals Service Personal Firearm Protocol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: United States Marshals Service Personal Firearm Protocol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?