Causey v. State of Alabama, et al (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: James F. Causey
Defendant: State of Alabama, Jeffery Baldwin and Steven T. Marshall
Case Number: 2:2021cv00022
Filed: January 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Emily C Marks
Referring Judge: Kelly F Pate
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO ANSWER habeas petition on or before 3/31/2021; Copy mailed to petitioner; mailed CMRRR w/copies of #5 amended petition to Warden Jeffery Baldwin & Attorney General for the State of Alabama. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 3/10/2021. (amf, )
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by James F. Causey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(am, )
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Causey is ORDERED to inform the Court by 3/11/2021, of his wishes to do one of the following: 1) Continue to proceed before this Court under 28 USC 2254 on the claims in his #1 petition; or 2) Amend his petition to assert any additional claims under 28 USC 2254 on which he wishes to challenge his conviction and sentence; or 3) Withdraw his petition. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 2/18/2021. (amf, )
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 4602061263. (amf, )
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: DIRECTING that by 2/12/2021, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file the appropriate affidavit supporting a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; DIRECTING the Clerk to send Petitioner a form for filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, as further set out in Order. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 1/28/2021. (mailed w/ifp form, as directed)(am, )
January 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by James F. Causey. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(es, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Causey v. State of Alabama, et al (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffery Baldwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven T. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James F. Causey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?