White v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: John Edward White
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2021cv00702
Filed: October 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Jerusha T Adams
Referring Judge: W Harold Albritton
2 Judge: Charles S Coody
3 Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2021 Received email from Eastern District of Virginia that case has been opened as case 1:21cv01335 on 11/30/2021 (NO PDF document attached to this notice). (djy, )
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #3 Recommendation is ADOPTED and that this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia pursuant to 28 USC 1391 and 28 USC 1404; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to take the necessary steps to effectuate the transfer of this action. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(es, )
November 29, 2021 Case transferred to Eastern District of Virginia. Electronically transferred via CM/ECF transfer to clerk. (No PDF attached to this entry) (es, )
November 23, 2021 No Objections received re #3 Recommendation. (No PDF attached to this entry). (es, )
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia under 28 USC 1391 and 28 USC 1404; It is further ORDERED that by 11/17/2021, White may file an objections to the Recommendation, as further set out in order; Objections to R&R due by 11/17/2021. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/3/2021. (es, ) Modified on 11/3/2021 to correct docketing naming error (es, ).
October 19, 2021 Filing 2 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against United States of America, filed by John Edward White. (NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(bes, )
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Copy of Order entered in Criminal Action 2:05-cr-132-WKW: the Clerk is ORDERED to do the following: (1) Strike the pro se motion for release (Doc. # 175) from the record in this case, that is, Case No. 2:05-CR-132-WKW; (2) Open a new civil action under 42 USC 1983 and docket this same motion in the newly opened civil action as the complaint; (3) Assign the newly opened civil action to the Magistrate Judge and District Judge to whom this case is assigned; and (4) Refer the case to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings uponcompletion of the foregoing directives. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/19/2021. (bes, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Edward White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?