Dorsen v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
Joe Mitchell Dorsey |
Blake Turman and Mark Odom |
2:2022cv00491 |
August 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Jerusha T Adams |
William Keith Watkins |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Alabama Southern; Case Number 1:22-cv-00276. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 3 ORDER ADOPTING #2 Report and Recommendation, and TRANSFERRING case the Northern Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 8/16/2022. (copy to Pltf) (mab) [Transferred from alsd on 8/18/2022.] |
Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING, in the interest of justice, that this action be TRANSFERRED to the Northern Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama as set out. Objections to R&R due 14 days from the date of service of this document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 7/20/2022. Copy to Plt. (fz) [Transferred from alsd on 8/18/2022.] |
Filing 1 INMATE 1983 COMPLAINT against Mark Odom, Blake Turman, filed by Joe Mitchell Dorsey. Referred to MJ Bivins. (PSU) (fz) [Transferred from alsd on 8/18/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.