IN RE: DIGITAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENTIONAL FILING OF DOCUMENTS, VIDEO FILES, AND AUDIO FILES
| Digital Requirements for Conventional Filing of Documents, Video Files, and Audio Files |
| 2:2024mc04032 |
| October 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 1
STANDING ORDER regarding Digital Requirements for Conventional Filing of Documents, Video Files, and Audio Files, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/8/2024. (WCL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: IN RE: DIGITAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENTIONAL FILING OF DOCUMENTS, VIDEO FILES, AND AUDIO FILES | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Unknown: Digital Requirements for Conventional Filing of Documents, Video Files, and Audio Files | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
