Jones v. Jay Jones, et al (INMATE2)
Case Number: 3:2006cv00178
Filed: February 28, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Opelika Office
Presiding Judge: Delores R. Boyd
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Jeffery B. Jones, it is the Recommendation of the Mag. Judge that: 1) Pla's claims against "Jurisdiction System" be dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process p ursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 2) Jurisdiction System be dismissed as a party to this complaint; and 3) This case with respect to the remaining dfts be referred back to the undersigned for add. proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 3/20/2006. Signed by Judge Delores R. Boyd on 3/14/06. (vma, )
March 1, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full as further set out;. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Lee Co Detention Fac. Signed by Judge Delores R. Boyd on 3/1/06. (vma, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Jay Jones, et al (INMATE2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?