Al-Hakim v. Lee County Justice Center et al (INMATE2)
Case Number: 3:2006cv01049
Filed: November 21, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Opelika Office
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Amir Abdul Al-Hakim, it is the Recommendation of the Mag Judge that Plaintiff's claims against the Lee County Justice Center be dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1915(3)(2)(B)(i); It is further Recommendation of the Mag Judge that this case be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 12/11/2006. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/28/06. (vma, )
November 27, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at LCDC; (furn: cashier). Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/27/06. (vma, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Al-Hakim v. Lee County Justice Center et al (INMATE2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?