Payne v. City of Alexander City

Plaintiff: Wanda Faye Payne
Defendant: City of Alexander City
Case Number: 3:2008cv00462
Filed: June 12, 2008
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Tallapoosa
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 17, 2009 40 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (2) the defendant's motion for summary judgment 35 is GRANTED and that judgment will be entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/17/09. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. City of Alexander City
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wanda Faye Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Alexander City
Represented By: Randall C. Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?