Nelson v. Lanier Health Services

Plaintiff: Karley E. Nelson
Defendant: Lanier Health Services
Case Number: 3:2009cv00700
Filed: July 27, 2009
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Chambers
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 13, 2010 64 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: (1) defendant's 61 Motion to Alter or Amend the Court's 08/04/2010 Memorandum Opinion and Order is DENIED; (2) the plaintiff's 63 Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend the Court's 08/04/2010 Memorandum Opinion and Order is DENIED. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/13/10. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nelson v. Lanier Health Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karley E. Nelson
Represented By: William Don Eddins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lanier Health Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?