Cannon v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
| Robert James Cannon |
| Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Cynthia Dillard, Jim Wynne, Velinda Weatherly, Robert Longshire, Raymond D. Smith and Kathy Mack Williams |
| 3:2010cv00325 |
| April 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Mobile |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Ira De Ment |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDERING and ADJUDGING as follows: (1) that the 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) that the plf's motion to adopt the recommendation of the Mag Judge be and the same is hereby GRANTED; (3) that the plf's 4 motion for voluntary dismissal of the complaint be and is hereby GRANTED; and (4) this case be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 5/13/10. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $5.20 be paid on or before May 10, 2010; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ the Mobile Community Based Facility. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 4/19/2010. (cc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
