Dalton v. Stancil et al (INMATE1)
| Christopher Dalton |
| Chad Stancil and Leon Aaron |
| 3:2010cv00843 |
| October 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Elmore |
| Ira De Ment |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The plf's 110 objections to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are overruled; 2) The 107 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; 3) That the dfts' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/31/2014. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTION; that on or before November 3, 2010 the plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of this Court the sum of $12.30 as an initial partial filing fee; that the plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of each prece ding month's as further set out; that the clerk is DIRECTED to furnish a copy of this order to the account clerk at the Bullock Correctional Facility; that except to the extent that payment is required under this order the plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 10/14/2010. (jg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
