Kidd v. Mando American Corporation

Plaintiff: Leanne Renee Kidd
Defendant: Mando American Corporation
Case Number: 3:2010cv00871
Filed: October 15, 2010
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Lee
0 Judge: W. Harold Albritton
1 Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 2, 2012 69 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Defendant's 61 Bill of Costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as further set out in the order. The Clerk of Court shall tax the sum of $4694.30 against Plaintiff Leanne Renee Kidd. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/2/2012. (dmn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kidd v. Mando American Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leanne Renee Kidd
Represented By: Alicia Kay Haynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mando American Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?