Klemetti v. Foster (MAG+)

Plaintiff: Steve Klemetti
Defendant: Nathaniel Foster
Case Number: 3:2011cv00137
Filed: February 28, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Macon
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 8, 2012 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the Recommendation 23 is ADOPTED, Plaintiffs Objection 24 is OVERRULED, and Defendant Foster's Motion for Summary Judgment 18 is GRANTED on all claims. An appropriate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/8/2012. (jg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Klemetti v. Foster (MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve Klemetti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathaniel Foster
Represented By: William Adams Gunter, IV
Represented By: Jennifer Nicole Weber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?