Mommon v. USAble Life (MAG+)

Plaintiff: Tikka Mommon
Defendant: USAble Life
Case Number: 3:2011cv00196
Filed: March 17, 2011
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Macon
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1001
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 10, 2011 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 21 Report and Recommendations; that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice; that an appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/10/2011. (cc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mommon v. USAble Life (MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tikka Mommon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USAble Life
Represented By: Steven H Begley
Represented By: Kevin Alan Rogers
Represented By: Kelly D. Simpkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?