Thomas v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
| Celestine Thomas |
| Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. |
| 3:2011cv00399 |
| May 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Macon |
| Charles S. Coody |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that Countrywide's 13 Motion to Stay Remand Order to Require Stipulation on Behalf of Putative Class Members or, in the Alternative, a Stipulation from Putative Class Members Currently Represented by Coun sel for Plaintiff is DENIED; further ORDERED that this action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Macon County, Alabama; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take appropriate steps to effectuate the remand. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/10/12. (Certified copy of this Order sent via CMRRR to Macon County Circuit Court Clerk.)(scn, )
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that Ms. Thomas's 7 motion to remand is GRANTED conditionally, provided that on or before February 28, 2012, she files a legally sufficient affidavit clarifying what the amount in controversy was on her individual claims at the time of removal. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 2/17/12. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
