Deshazer v. Jones (INMATE 1)

Plaintiff: Gregory T. Deshazer
Defendant: Jay Jones
Case Number: 3:2012cv00027
Filed: January 9, 2012
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Truman M. Hobbs
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 13, 2012 12 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that: 1. The RECOMMENDATIONS 10 & 11 of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunction 1 & 6 are DENIED; and 3. This case is dismissed without prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).A separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 3/13/2012. (jg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deshazer v. Jones (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory T. Deshazer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?