Newman v. Colvin(CONSENT)

Newman v. Colvin(CONSENT)

Plaintiff:	Roy Jack Newman
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	3:2012cv00941
Filed:	October 26, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Opelika Office
County:	Lee
Presiding Judge:	Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 20, 2013	Filing 16 FINAL JUDGMENT directing as follows: (1) The Defendant's 15 Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment be and is hereby GRANTED and Judgment is to be entered in favor of the Plaintiff Roy Jack Newman and against the Defendant, Commissioner; (2) Th e Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to reopen this case for the purposes of entering final judgment in favor of the Plaintiff; (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 8/20/13. (scn, )
January 30, 2013	Filing 11 ORDER advising the parties that without the consent of the parties, the Magistrate Judge cannot take dispositive action in this case. Counsel are DIRECTED to complete and send to the Clerk of the Court either the attached form consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction or the form requesting reassignment to a District Judge so that the form is received by the Clerk on or before 2/15/2013. DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS FORM. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 1/30/2013. (dmn, )

Date Filed

Document Text

August 20, 2013

Filing 16 FINAL JUDGMENT directing as follows: (1) The Defendant's 15 Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment be and is hereby GRANTED and Judgment is to be entered in favor of the Plaintiff Roy Jack Newman and against the Defendant, Commissioner; (2) Th e Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to reopen this case for the purposes of entering final judgment in favor of the Plaintiff; (3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 8/20/13. (scn, )

January 30, 2013

Filing 11 ORDER advising the parties that without the consent of the parties, the Magistrate Judge cannot take dispositive action in this case. Counsel are DIRECTED to complete and send to the Clerk of the Court either the attached form consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction or the form requesting reassignment to a District Judge so that the form is received by the Clerk on or before 2/15/2013. DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS FORM. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 1/30/2013. (dmn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newman v. Colvin(CONSENT)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy Jack Newman
Represented By:	Lauryn Akens Lauderdale
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?