Love v. Centaur Building Services Southeast, Inc.

Defendant: Centaur Building Services Southeast, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kinera Love
Case Number: 3:2013cv00204
Filed: April 1, 2013
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Lee
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 12, 2013 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 17 Motion to Extend Deadline for Amendments and to Add Parties, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/12/2013. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Love v. Centaur Building Services Southeast, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centaur Building Services Southeast, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kinera Love
Represented By: Lateefah Muhammad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?