Densel v. Fidelity Life Association

Plaintiff: Wanda Densel
Defendant: Fidelity Life Association
Case Number: 3:2013cv00756
Filed: October 16, 2013
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
County: Lee
Referring Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 18, 2013 3 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER directing that the parties Show Cause, if any there be, in writing by 11/1/2013, as to why this case should not be remanded to state court for want of subject-matter jurisdiction.. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/18/13. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Densel v. Fidelity Life Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fidelity Life Association
Represented By: Blake Lee Oliver
Represented By: Phillip Exton Adams, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wanda Densel
Represented By: Benjamin Howard Parr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?