Pendleton v. State of Alabama (INMATE 2)
Plaintiff: Artavis D. Pendleton
Defendant: State of Alabama
Case Number: 3:2017cv00309
Filed: May 11, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Opelika Office
County: Barbour
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; and (2) this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of plf to pay the initial partial filing fee under 28 USC 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by the court. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/31/17. (djy, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pendleton v. State of Alabama (INMATE 2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Artavis D. Pendleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?