Roller v. Kmart Corporation et al (CONSENT)
| Misty Roller |
| Kmart Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation, Kmart Corporation doing business as Big Kmart Discount Store #4760 and Sears Holdings Corporation doing business as Big Kmart Discount Store #4760 |
| 3:2018cv00735 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Opelika Office |
| Russell |
| Gray M Borden |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
RULE 26(f) ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable, as further set out in order; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/30/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 10/9/2018. (wcl, )
|
| Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge signed by counsel for Misty Roller. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for Kmart Corporation. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge e-signed by counsel for Sears Holdings Corporation. (wcl, ) |
| ***Attorney Christopher Brian Saville for Sears Holdings Corporation added pursuant to #12 corporate conflict disclosure statement (NO PDF document attached to this notice). (djy, ) |
| Filing 12 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Sears Holdings Corporation. (Gambacurta, Virginia) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Sears Holdings Corporation; Corporate Disclosures due by 9/7/2018. (Attachments: #1 standing order & format)(djy, ) |
| Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Misty Roller re #6 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Worstell, Brian) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER directing counsel for the parties to complete and send to the clerk the appropriate attached form so that the form is received by the clerk on or before 9/14/2018, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 8/23/18. (djy, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (def) Sears Holdings Corporation. (djy, ) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Sears Holdings Corporation.(Gambacurta, Virginia) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Misty Roller; Corporate Disclosures due by 8/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 standing order & format)(djy, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (def) Kmart Corporation and (plf) Misty Roller. (djy, ) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Kmart Corporation.(djy, ) |
| Filing 3 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Kmart Corporation. (djy, ) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF REMOVAL by Kmart Corporation re filing of #1 Notice of Removal. (djy, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kmart Corporation from Circuit Court of Russell County, Alabama, case number 57-CV-2018-900210.00. ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602050375) (Attachments: #1 state court complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 civil cover sheet, #6 fee receipt)(djy, ) |
| COMPLAINT against Kmart Corporation, Sears Holdings Corporation, filed by Misty Roller. (NO PDF document attached to this notice-See Docket entry #1 ).(djy, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Misty Roller. (NO PDF document attached to this notice-See Docket entry #1 ). (djy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
