Jackson v. Biggers et al (MAG+)
Quindre Jackson |
Deborah Hill Biggers, Blair Sistrunk, Melody Ridings Baldwin and Bakari Bascomb |
3:2019cv00637 |
September 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Andrew L Brasher |
Susan Russ Walker |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDERS that the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, see Doc. #2 , is GRANTED.1 It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to defer service of process on the defendant until further order of the court, following the court's 1915(e) review of the plaintiff's complaint, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 10/16/2019. (kh, ) |
Filing 3 ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this case is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration and disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Accordingly, Plaintiffs #2 motion is REFERRED to the magistrate judge assigned to this case. Signed by Honorable Judge Andrew L. Brasher on 9/20/2019. (kh, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Quindre Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed IFP)(kr, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Melody Ridings Baldwin, Bakari Bascomb, Deborah Hill Biggers, Blair Sistrunk (No Filing fee; No IFP), filed by Quindre Jackson.(kr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.