Vaughn v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
| Hurtis Vaughn |
| CSX Transportation, Inc. and Vernon Harthorne Clark, Jr. |
| 3:2021cv00781 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Grimes, Charles) |
Filing 12
ORDER: It is ORDERED that the parties shall file their Rule 26(f) report as soon as practicable, as further set out in order; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/14/2022. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 12/17/2021. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: It is ORDERED that any party wishing to provide such consent must complete the form and submit it to the Clerk by 1/14/2022, as further set out in order; Any party wishing to submit the reassignment form must mail it to the above address by 1/14/2022, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 12/17/2021. (amf, )
|
| Filing 10 Conflict Disclosure Statement re: #9 Notice of Deficiency by Vernon Harthorne Clark, Jr. (Grimes, Charles) Modified on 12/14/2021 to add linkage & clarify text as reflected in pleading (am, ). |
| Filing 9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Vernon Harthorne Clark, Jr.; Corporate Disclosures due by 12/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order & Sample)(am, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Vernon Harthorne Clark, Jr. (am, ) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Vernon Harthorne Clark, Jr.(Grimes, Charles) |
| ***PURSUANT TO THE #7 ANSWER - Attorney Morris Wade Richardson for Vernon Harthorne Clark, Jr added. (NO PDF attached to this entry) (am, ) |
| Filing 6 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Hurtis Vaughn. (Luck, Aaron) |
| Filing 5 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by CSX Transportation, Inc. re #4 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Richardson, Morris) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.; Corporate Disclosures due by 11/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(amf, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Plaintiff Hurtis Vaughn & Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc..(amf, ) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 - 1 Complaint by CSX Transportation, Inc..(amf, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CSX Transportation, Inc. from Circuit Court of Macon County, Alabama, case number 46-CV-2021-900116.00. (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number 4602065263) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #11 Civil Cover Sheet, #12 Filing Fee Receipt)(amf, ) |
| COMPLAINT against CSX Transportation, Inc., Vernon Harthorne Clark, Jr., filed by Hurtis Vaughn. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 - 1 for PDF)(amf, ) |
| NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal by CSX Transportation, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 - 10 for PDF) (amf, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Hurtis Vaughn. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 - 1 for PDF) (amf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
