Hill v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
Kendrick Omar Hill |
Joseph H. Headley, Steven T. Marshall and Ventress Correctional Facility |
3:2022cv00163 |
April 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Kelly F Pate |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 6/10/2022, Petitioner must either submit the $5.00 filing fee or file a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a prison account statemen, as further set out in order; The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a form for use in applying to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 6/2/2022. (bes, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER: it is ORDERED that by 4/29/2022, Hill shall either submit the $5.00 filing fee or file the appropriate affidavit supporting a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Hill a form for use in filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 4/8/2022. (bes, ) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Kendrick Omar Hill. (hrs, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kendrick Omar Hill.(NO IFP; NO FILING FEE)(hrs, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.