Kemp v. Target Corporation

Plaintiff: Susie A. Kemp
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 1:2012cv03858
Filed: November 13, 2012
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Eastern Office
County: Calhoun
Presiding Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29:2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 18, 2013 28 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 19 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Collective Action Claim Without Prejudice. The plaintiff is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within 14 days to address the issues discussed in this Opinion. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 9/18/2013. (JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kemp v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susie A. Kemp
Represented By: Lee D Winston
Represented By: Roderick T Cooks
Represented By: Courtney L Calhoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?