Shehan v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Plaintiff: James Shehan
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Case Number: 1:2014cv00900
Filed: May 14, 2014
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Eastern Office
County: Talladega
Presiding Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47:0151
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 3, 2014 29 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, as set out, re 16 MOTION to Stay filed by Wells Fargo Bank NA. Wells Fargo's motion to stay, 16 , is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 11/3/14. (CTS, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shehan v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank NA
Represented By: Ryan James Hebson
Represented By: R Frank Springfield(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Shehan
Represented By: Gina DeRosier Greenwald(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Michael Lewis Greenwald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?