The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Boyd et al
||The Prudential Insurance Company of America
||Frederick L Boyd and F.B.
||June 11, 2014
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||Harwell G Davis
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||29 U.S.C. § 1132
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 2, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 19 First MOTION for Disbursement of Funds. The proceeds from Cormella Boyd's life insurance policy, $548,556.14, plus interest, are therefore to be distributed to Frederick Montez Boyd, the altern ate beneficiary under Cormella Boyd's life insurance policy upon application by Frederick Montez Boyd to the Clerk of Court for distribution of the funds interpleaded in this case, however, no such distribution shall occur before the time to file a Notice of Appeal of this Order has expired without such notice having been filed. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 3/2/2016. (JLC)
|September 16, 2015
ORDER -re: R&R 30 . The court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge and ACCEPTS the recommendations. It is ORDERED that this court will hold an evidentiary hearing, on a date after six months from the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 9/16/2015. (AVC)
|January 5, 2015
PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 54(B)-re: 17 Report and Recommendation. The court hereby ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS IN PART the recommendations of the magistrate judge. It is ORDERED that the motion of Prudential is GRANTED, except to the extent that it requests injunctive relief against the Dfts. Any and all claims against Prudential relative to the Group Policy and/or the Death Benefit are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Prudential is DISMISSED from this litigation. The parties are hereby REALIGNED with Frederick L. Boyd as pltf and, F.B., a minor, by and through his guardian in fact, Charity Teague, as dft. This Court RETAINS jurisdiction over the Dfts, who are compelledto litigate, adjust and/or settle among each other their respective and lawfulentitlement to the Death Benefit, or upon their failure to do so, this Court shall settle and adjust the claims and determine to whom the total funds shall be paid. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 1/5/2015. (AVC)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?