Thomas v. Wade et al
| Darian Levon Thomas |
| Matthew Wade, Chames, E Starr and Calhoun County Jail |
| 1:2019cv01551 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER that the plaintiff pay the initial partial filing fee of $4.93 within 15 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 11/15/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Consent Form filed by Darian Levon Thomas. (KAM) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee of $4.93, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 10/7/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darian Levon Thomas. (KAM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Notice of Deficient Pleading - plaintiff must file a new verified application to proceed ifp within 30 daya. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 9/19/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darian Levon Thomas. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calhoun County Jail, Chames, E Starr, Matthew Wade, filed by Darian Levon Thomas.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
