Doe v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Bryson Ingram, Piedmont City School District, BF, Steve Smith, JC and James Blanchard
Case Number: 1:2020cv01906
Filed: December 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Annemarie Carney Axon
Nature of Suit: Education
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION to Withdraw #5 MOTION to Seal Case Motion to Proceed Anonymously and Motion to Strike by Bryson Ingram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Wolter, Daniel)
January 27, 2021 Filing 14 Summons Issued as to BF, JC. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK)
January 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 1/20/21. (SAC)
January 19, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANT PIEDMONT CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION by Piedmont City School District.(Brooks, Taylor)
January 19, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by James Blanchard, Steve Smith.(Carr, Clay)
January 18, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark S Boardman on behalf of James Blanchard, Steve Smith (Boardman, Mark)
January 18, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Clay R Carr on behalf of James Blanchard, Steve Smith (Carr, Clay)
January 18, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine H Watkins on behalf of James Blanchard, Steve Smith (Watkins, Katherine) Modified on 1/19/2021 (KEK). *Filed in error per counsel of record*
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER re #5 Motion to Seal Case Motion to Proceed Anonymously and Motion to Strike by Bryson Ingram - A response is due on or before January 27, 2021; a reply, if any, is due on or before February 3, 2021. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 1/13/21. (SAC)
January 12, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Bryson Ingram.(Wolter, Daniel)
January 12, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Seal Case Motion to Proceed Anonymously and Motion to Strike by Bryson Ingram. (Wolter, Daniel)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: The court GRANTS Defendant Bryson Ingram's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint. (Doc. #3 ). Mr. Ingram SHALL file a responsive pleading on or before January 15, 2021. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 1/5/2021. (KEK)
January 5, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Bryson Ingram. (Wolter, Daniel)
December 10, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to James Blanchard, Bryson Ingram, Piedmont City School District, Steve Smith. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK)
December 1, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BF, James Blanchard, Bryson Ingram, JC, Piedmont City School District, Steve Smith, filed by John Doe.(KEK)
December 1, 2020 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3725935. related document #1 COMPLAINT against BF, James Blanchard, Bryson Ingram, JC, Piedmont City School District, Steve Smith, filed by John Doe.(KEK). (Artrip, Eric)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryson Ingram
Represented By: Daniel S Wolter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Piedmont City School District
Represented By: Taylor P Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Smith
Represented By: Clay R Carr
Represented By: Mark S Boardman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Blanchard
Represented By: Clay R Carr
Represented By: Mark S Boardman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Represented By: Eric J Artrip
Represented By: Teresa Ryder Mastando
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?