Trotter v. Bridgestone/Firestone Americas Holding, Inc et al

Plaintiff: Glenn Trotter
Defendant: Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. and Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc., Hourly Employees Retirement Plan
Case Number: 2:2007cv00038
Filed: January 5, 2007
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28:1441eri - Petition for removal - E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trotter v. Bridgestone/Firestone Americas Holding, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glenn Trotter
Represented By: Thomas W H Buck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.
Represented By: James C Pennington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc., Hourly Employees Retirement Plan
Represented By: James C Pennington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?