Appell et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.

Plaintiff: Roger Charles Appell and Diane Nury Appell
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2007cv01773
Filed: September 27, 2007
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Inge P Johnson
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28:1441eri - Petition for removal - E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Appell et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Charles Appell
Represented By: W Eugene Rutledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane Nury Appell
Represented By: W Eugene Rutledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen M Parham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?