Doe et al v. City of Alabaster, Alabama et al
| John Doe , VIII, Jane Doe, I, John Doe, IX, Jane Doe, II, John Doe, VI, John Doe , VII, John Doe, I, John Doe, II, John Doe III, John Doe, IV and John Doe, V |
| City of Alabaster, Alabama, City of Pelham, Alabama, City of Hoover, Alabama, City of Leeds, Alabama and City of Irondale, Alabama |
| 2:2011cv03448 |
| September 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Virginia Emerson Hopkins |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 8/1/2012. (JLC)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; Accordingly, pursuant to its authority under Fed. R. Civ. P. 21, the Court finds that this case should be severed into individual cases for each plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TERM all plaintiffs other than Cecilia Cano Diaz as party-plaintiffs in the present case, and to TERM all defendants other than the City of Leeds, Alabama as party-defendants in the present case. Further, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign the newly opened casesto the undersigned. Nicolas Garrido-Carapia, Ricardo Maximino-Gonzalez, Rafael Romero-Galvan, Juan Valdez-Ruiz, Hector Bernabe-Leon and Maria De Jesus Castanon-Lopez terminated. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 7/17/2012. (JLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
