Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. Whitt
Plaintiff: Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Defendant: James Whitt
Case Number: 2:2012cv00690
Filed: February 28, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Northeastern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 04/26/12. (CVA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. Whitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Represented By: Stephanie Houston Mays
Represented By: Daniel P Hart
Represented By: Jeffrey Sand
Represented By: Frederick T Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Whitt
Represented By: Harold E Hargrave, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?