Jones v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Company

Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Company
Plaintiff: Ernesteen Jones
Case Number: 2:2013cv00624
Filed: April 4, 2013
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Referring Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 2, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 7/2/2013. (JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Company
Represented By: Edward S Sledge, III
Represented By: Frederick G Helmsing, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ernesteen Jones
Represented By: Leah O Taylor
Represented By: Tammy M Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.