Culligan International Company v. Water Systems of Birmingham, Inc.

Plaintiff: Culligan International Company
Defendant: Water Systems of Birmingham, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv01085
Filed: June 7, 2013
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Referring Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 26, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 12 First MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 8/26/2013. (JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Culligan International Company v. Water Systems of Birmingham, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Water Systems of Birmingham, Inc.
Represented By: Jason R Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Culligan International Company
Represented By: Daniel J Burnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?