Rutledge v. Aveda et al

Plaintiff: Adrienne Rutledge
Defendant: Aveda, Aveda Institute, Estee Lauder Companies Inc, The and Beauty Basics Inc
Movant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2014cv00145
Filed: January 24, 2014
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Referring Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 31:3729
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 15, 2016 57 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 56 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING plff's 51 MOTION for Leave to Submit an Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 1/15/2016. (YMB)
May 12, 2015 50 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court ACCEPTS the recommendation that all four counts of plff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as set out herein. Any motion for leave to amend complaint is due by 5/22/2015. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 5/22/2015. (YMB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rutledge v. Aveda et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adrienne Rutledge
Represented By: Roderick T Cooks
Represented By: Lee David Winston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aveda
Represented By: Kimberly Lockhart Bell
Represented By: Timothy John Hatch(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Alan T Rogers
Represented By: Robert C Walters(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aveda Institute
Represented By: Kimberly Lockhart Bell
Represented By: Timothy John Hatch(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Alan T Rogers
Represented By: Robert C Walters(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Estee Lauder Companies Inc, The
Represented By: Kimberly Lockhart Bell
Represented By: Timothy John Hatch(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Alan T Rogers
Represented By: Robert C Walters(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beauty Basics Inc
Represented By: Ollie A Cleveland, III(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Donald F Winningham, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: United States of America
Represented By: Thomas E Borton, IV
Represented By: Joyce White Vance(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?