Harrison v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company

Plaintiff: Jeff Harrison
Defendant: United States Pipe and Foundry Company
Case Number: 2:2014cv01806
Filed: September 23, 2014
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: John E Ott
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15:2
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 1, 2016 29 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER adopting 25 Report and Recommendations, and denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 9/1/2016. (PSM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harrison v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeff Harrison
Represented By: Gregory O Wiggins(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Pipe and Foundry Company
Represented By: Anne Knox Averitt(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Anne R Yuengert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?