Ricks v. Aaron et al
Demonsia L. Ricks |
Samuel Aaron, Michael Weirich, Cedric Specks, Cheryl Price, Jeffery Baldwin, Corizon Medical Services and Nurse |
staff attorney |
2:2015cv00070 |
January 15, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Southern Office |
Jefferson |
John E Ott |
C Lynwood Smith |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER - Rick's 99 first motion in limine is DENIED; Aaron's purported prior acts are excluded. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 6/20/2018. (KAM) |
Filing 65 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; the Magistrate Judge's 64 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is adopted and accepted; it is ordered that defendants 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment is granted as more fully set out in order; it is further ordered tha t defendants Michael Weirich, Cedrick Specks, Cheryl Price, Jeffery Baldwin, Deaundra L. Johnson, John Arthur, Patricia McGrue, Cathy Ford and Corizon, LLC are dismissed with prejudice from this action; the remaining excessive force/failure to interv ene claims and corresponding state assault and battery claims against defendants Samuel Aaron, Rickey Cunningham, Thaddeus Smith, and Cameron Jones are referred to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 10/17/16. (SPT ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.