Wardlow v. Whiten
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 29, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Based upon the foregoing, the defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. There being no genuine issues of material fact as to the issue of municipal liability or qualified immunity as to Chief Roper, Chief Roper is entitled to summary judgment on all claims against him in his official capacity and on all claims against him in his individual capacity except Wardlows state law malicious prosecution claim in Count E. The remaining claims asserted against Whiten proceed because genuine issues of material fact preclude judgment as a matter of law. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 3/29/2017. (KEK)
|October 28, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Because the claim against Black Mark in the Amended Complaint does not relate-back to the original complaint, it is barred by the statute of limitations. Black Marks motion to dismiss, (doc. 8 ), is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 10/28/2015. (KEK)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?