Sul v. Taylor

Petitioner: Robert H. Sul
Respondent: W. T. Taylor
Case Number: 2:2015cv01208
Filed: July 17, 2015
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Talladega
Referring Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Presiding Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 30, 2016 12 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the 10 Magistrates Judge's Report and Recommendation and re-characterize this action as a request for leave to file a successive petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and transfer this action to the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 6/30/2016. (JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sul v. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert H. Sul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. T. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?