Guyton v. Watts

Plaintiff: James E Guyton
Defendant: Ray L Watts
Case Number: 2:2016cv01080
Filed: July 1, 2016
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 31, 2017 20 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER- The motion to dismiss filed by the Board (Doc 15 ) is GRANTED, and all claims against the Board, except Pltf's Title VII claims, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; The motion to dismiss filed by Dr. Watts (Doc 6 ) is GRANTED, and all claims against him are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 3/31/17. (MRR, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guyton v. Watts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James E Guyton
Represented By: Ralph B Mayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray L Watts
Represented By: David R Mellon
Represented By: Earlisha S Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?