Raymond v. GEICO Casualty Company

Plaintiff: Steven Raymond
Defendant: GEICO Casualty Company
Case Number: 2:2016cv01292
Filed: August 8, 2016
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: Madeline Hughes Haikala
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 20, 2018 22 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Accordingly, the Court GRANTS GEICOs motion to dismiss (Doc. 16). The Court DENIES AS MOOT Mr. Raymonds motion to dismiss Count III (Doc. 20). The Court DISMISSES Mr. Raymonds claims WITH PREJUDICE. The Court will enter a separate final judgment. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 4/20/2018. (KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raymond v. GEICO Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Raymond
Represented By: Kirby D Farris
Represented By: Thomas Russell Goree, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEICO Casualty Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?