Barr v. Jefferson County Barber Commision, The et al
Geta Barr |
Jefferson County Barber Commision, The, Florence Johnson, Trina Paulding, Center Point, City of, Thomas Henderson, John Wood and John Watkins |
2:2016cv01340 |
August 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Southern Office |
Jefferson |
T Michael Putnam |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 132 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 11/23/2020. (SRD) |
Filing 127 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court DENIES Barr's motion for summary judgment (doc. 106 ). The court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the JCBC Defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. 108 ) as stated within. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 9/28/2020.(SRD) |
Filing 80 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 79 MOTION to Set Aside Judgment. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 6/21/2018. (JLC) |
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 5/15/2018. (JLC) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 7 MOTION to Remand. In accordance with the Order entered on October 3, 2016 (doc. 12), any opposition to the Motion To Dismiss (doc. 4) should be filed within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Any reply should be filed no later than seven (7) days after the date on which the opponent's responsive brief is due. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 11/18/2016. (JLC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.