Coosa Riverkeeper Inc v. Oxford Waterworks and Sewer Board
Plaintiff: Coosa Riverkeeper Inc
Defendant: Oxford Waterworks and Sewer Board
Case Number: 2:2016cv01737
Filed: October 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Southern Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: John E Ott
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 6/16/2017. (KAM, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coosa Riverkeeper Inc v. Oxford Waterworks and Sewer Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Coosa Riverkeeper Inc
Represented By: Barry A Brock
Represented By: Sarah Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oxford Waterworks and Sewer Board
Represented By: Adam Kent Israel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?