Awtrey v. McRight

Plaintiff: Rosemarie Awtrey
Defendant: Edward L McRight, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2017cv00851
Filed: May 23, 2017
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 7, 2018 28 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the foregoing reasons, the Third-Party Defendants motion to dismiss, (doc. 16), is DENIED. The Third-Party Defendants are DIRECTED to answer the third-party complaint by February 28, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 2/7/2018. (KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Awtrey v. McRight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosemarie Awtrey
Represented By: Nicole Bohannon Hampton
Represented By: Alyce Manley Spruell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward L McRight, Jr.
Represented By: Maxwell H Pulliam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?