Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Boatright Railroad Products et al

Plaintiff: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant: Boatright Railroad Products Inc, Boatright Railroad Products LLC, Rush Shane Boatright, John Steven Bookout and Jimmy Lee Watt
Case Number: 2:2017cv01787
Filed: October 23, 2017
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: T Michael Putnam
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 18:1962
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 21, 2018 51 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the Defendants' motions to dismiss 35 and 37 are GRANTED with respect to Norfolk Southern's RICO claims, negligenceclaim, and claim for fraudulent misrepresentation, to the extent the complaint states such claims. Those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In all otherrespects, the motions are DENIED. The motion to strike 48 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 5/21/2018. (AFS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Boatright Railroad Products et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Represented By: Jeffrey D Cohen
Represented By: Paul David Keenan
Represented By: Annette L Kinderman
Represented By: Crawford S McGivaren, Jr
Represented By: Christopher Merrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boatright Railroad Products Inc
Represented By: Richard E Davis
Represented By: Alfred H Perkins, Jr
Represented By: Christopher E Vinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boatright Railroad Products LLC
Represented By: Richard E Davis
Represented By: Alfred H Perkins, Jr
Represented By: Christopher E Vinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rush Shane Boatright
Represented By: Richard E Davis
Represented By: Alfred H Perkins, Jr
Represented By: Christopher E Vinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Steven Bookout
Represented By: Richard E Davis
Represented By: Alfred H Perkins, Jr
Represented By: Christopher E Vinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmy Lee Watt
Represented By: Brett H Knight
Represented By: Michael W Whisonant, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?