Highland Trucking LLC et al v. Fleetmatics, a Verizon Corporation et al
Jeb Express LLC, KKs Trucking LLC, Highland Trucking LLC, Southern Armour Freight Inc and GAP Trucking LLC |
Fleetmatics, a Verizon Corporation, Verizon Connect Fleet USA LLC and Fleetmatics, a Verizon Corporation d/b/a Verizon Connect Fleet USA LLC |
2:2018cv01123 |
July 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Southern Office |
Fayette |
T Michael Putnam |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT of a magistrate judge in a civil action. (KEK) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by GAP Trucking LLC, Highland Trucking LLC, Jeb Express LLC, KKs Trucking LLC, Southern Armour Freight Inc. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fleetmatics, a Verizon Corporation, Verizon Connect Fleet USA LLC, filed by Highland Trucking LLC, Southern Armour Freight Inc, Jeb Express LLC, GAP Trucking LLC, KKs Trucking LLC.(KEK) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3137339 (B4601090712). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Fleetmatics, a Verizon Corporation, Verizon Connect Fleet USA LLC, filed by Highland Trucking LLC, Southern Armour Freight Inc, Jeb Express LLC, GAP Trucking LLC, KKs Trucking LLC.(KEK). (Dodson, Kimberly) Modified on 7/24/2018 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.