Some v. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC
| Shiquita Some |
| Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC |
| 2:2018cv02120 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| T Michael Putnam |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC. Any opposition shall be filed no later than February 21, 2019. Any reply may be filed no later than February 28, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 2/7/2019. (PMA)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than March 21, 2019. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after March 21, 2019. A status conference is hereby SET for 10:30 am on March 4, 2019. The conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 2/5/19. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 8 Memorandum of Law in Support of #7 MOTION to Dismiss . (Epperson, Morgan) Modified docket text on 2/4/2019 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC. (Epperson, Morgan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC served on 1/14/2019, answer due 2/4/2019. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC, sent to US Marshals for service (MRR, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER- The pltf's motion to proceed without payment of the filing fee is GRANTED; The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 1/2/19. (MRR, )
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and MOTION to Appoint Counsel Motion is RIPE 12/27/2018. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion. by Shiquita Some. (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC, filed by Shiquita Some. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(MRR, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Some v. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shiquita Some | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Honda Manufacturing of Alabama LLC | |
| Represented By: | Morgan Pike Epperson |
| Represented By: | Lisa Karen Atkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
