Broadhead v. Terrell et al
| James Broadhead |
| Officer, C/O R Gasdon, R Gaines, C Threasher, D Fleeton, C Tunstall, A Marks, L. Terrell, C Sutton, J Rodgers and Antguan Hill |
| 2:2019cv01341 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith and with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the three-strikes provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.Costs are taxed to the plaintiff. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/13/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/13/2019. (KAM) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by James Broadhead (KAM) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by James Broadhead. Objections to R&R due by 9/7/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 8/23/2019. (JLC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by James Broadhead (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James Broadhead.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
